Terrorists Attack: a Media Analysis :: essays research papers

Terrorists AttackFebruary 26, 1993, the day that terrorists made the biggest attack on American soil to that point. It was early afternoon on a Friday, 1218 pm to be exact, a car bomb ripped through the guts of the now infamous North World Trade boil down twin tower. It happened very quickly, and with tabu warning, normal people were simply going about their daily business, when whole of a sudden, the building shook, the power went out, and smoke began to fill all 110 floors of the towers. Many wondered what had happened, had a plane struck the building, was it an earthquake? D, none of the above, some crazed maniac had decided to kill 5 people and pique many more just to get some point across.This event graced the front page of compositions and news magazines across the country, the New York Times was the newspaper ambient to the action. Covrage in this newspaper was published one day after the event, and covered non only the event but the ensuing traffic chaos it caused. Being a newspaper local to New York City, the site of the attack, the newpaper catered to the interests of its local readers. The New York Times, however, is overly circulated around the country, and around the world. This required the newpaper editors, publishers, and writers to remain sensitive to the feelings and thoughts of readers in the broader reading audience.Newsweek Magazine also published insurance coverage of the attack. Their primary audience is a national one, and consequently, the coverage is geared toward a broader audience. Also, seeing as the magazine is only published at one sentence a week, rather than daily as the New York Times, Newsweek had more time to gather facts and evidence. This added time for research leads more to a fact based coverage than a question based coverage.One interesting observation is that it seems both sources immediately assume that foreign terrorists were the primary perpetrators of this attack. Neither article comes right out and says it , however both are rather ambiguous about it. Newsweek does mention the possibility of a domestic source for the violence, but spends much more time and effort explaining the possible foreign sources. Overall both articles seem rather straightforward in their representation of the event, and remain rather simplistic, so as not to confuse the reading audience.When an event of this magnitude occurs, emotions are bound to play a role in the coverage.